Saturday, October 10, 2009

School Culture

Site: http://teachers.net/mentors/middle_school/topic13722/9.16.09.19.14.07.html
Teachers.net (Middle School Teachers Chatboard)

Topic: School Culture

Dates Blogged:
09-16-09 to 09-18-09

Body:
On September 16, 2009 a middle school teacher posted a question about standards in inner-city schools, titled: School Culture. He explained that he was raised in a strict Catholic school and was now teaching in an urban school, where many kids talked a lot and were not accustomed to structure, in which, he was familiar with. His question to the site was if he should "adjust his standards and his expectations for them?" Another respondent indicated that the reason he was having trouble was because he was a new teacher and the kids were testing him. Therefore, he should keep his standards and prove to the kids that he's not a pushover. At that point the kids would realize he means business and find respect for him. A third respondent suggested to read Ruby Payne's "Framework for Understanding Poverty" because it defines their background and gives some foundation for why they behave in certain manners. She was from a middle class area herself and found it useful in understanding. She also suggested to talk to the children about middle and upper-class lifestyles in order to bring the children closer to understanding his methodology and approaches in life. She addressed that in order to create a workable environment, both parties need to understand each others background.

Everyone who addressed the issue the teacher faced agreed to keep his standards and expectations. Inner-city kids have different standards of living, in which are developed in their environment. For example, in poorer urban areas, women tend to be more concerned about their physical traits as opposed to accomplishments in contrast to middle or upper class areas. However, the issue of adjusting to and accepting the situations at hand do not have concrete answers; but theoretical answers.

Responses I Posted:
I responded that inner-city kids have different goals and priorities that extend beyond in school but into the household. However, the kids will respect you regardless if you show you have their best interest at heart. Therefore, my final suggestion was to keep his standards, though, to increase his tolerance, in which the way the standards are achieved. Furthermore, perhaps, adjusting standards to their needs and conditions may help in finding mutual satisfaction between the teacher and the students. I responded to this person's post because I've been teaching at a title one school for four years and still have to adapt in different ways. However, he must find his own way of dealing with his particular group of kids and see what works in order to advise the next teacher.

Useful Information for My Teaching:
After questioning my own teaching styles and wondering what solutions apply to the kids I teach, other's concerns to the same problems have helped me realize it's not just my own issues but a broad case that many deal with. This post helped me see my understanding develop on how to adapt to inner-city culture because his question was one that I asked several years ago and I have newer questions that others haven't recognized yet.

3 comments:

  1. 1. Are you familiar with the publication "Framework for Understanding Poverty" that was referenced? If so would you recommend it to other teachers, why or why not?

    2. Was there any response to your posting about inner-city students goals and priorities?

    3. Reflecting on your comment that middle and upper class females are less concerned about physical traits, I wonder if that generalization is valid. Would be interesting to ask teachers in those schools. What are your thoughts having thought more about this?

    Glad to see this assignment has encouraged you to reflect on your own teaching style. How has knowing that others have similar concerns to the same problems changed your perspective?

    I look forward to reading your responses.

    Dr. S

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. I've never heard of the "Framework for Understanding Poverty." However, during some liesure time I hope to check it out. I'm not sure it's too much different than other "comfort" books or articles pertaining to urban settings.

    2. Nobody responded to me directly but one person referred to me in agreement. However, everyone felt they needed to preach directly to the teacher in question. I find that teachers are willing to overextend themselves to help or just let you rot, there's never just advice.

    3. In response to the females in the inner-city and upper-class I would stand by the comment I made. From dating different types of females (I'm married now) I've experienced different priorities. The way I've felt about school work low-ses females felt about their physical traits whereas middle-class females worried about school work with me. Now as a teacher, I see more effort in appearance than quality in work and themselves. Overall, I would justify the comment by saying inner-city individuals are more concerned with instant gratification whereas middle and upper class vision the long term goals.

    4. Realistically, seeing others asking and observing the same behaviors and characteristics as myself break down my self-esteem. When I see others facing the same struggles I feel more indifferent and don't feel any smarter at that point. Like anyone, when I figure something out I like to know it's me who made the discovery. This is a bit selfish but I son't feel as smart as I thought I was.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HI David;

    Thank you for your honest reflective responses. You apparently are growing professionally as you discover what works for you and your students to enhance their learning.

    Week Grade
    Participation: 2/2
    Organization: 10/10
    Responses to Professor's Questons: 10/10
    Grammar: 10/10

    32/32= 100%

    ReplyDelete